Storm Over Supplier Claims as Wavinya Ndeti Disowns Sammy Kioko in Machakos Payment Row

Wavinya Ndeti has pushed back against claims by Sammy Kioko that the county owes him money, setting the stage for a heated dispute that blends business, politics, and public accountability. In a firm statement issued on April 1, the governor said official records do not recognise Kioko as a supplier, challenging the basis of his demands.

“Our records indicate that Mr Sammy Kioko is not a registered supplier,” she stated, drawing a clear line on the matter. Instead, the county identifies Movata Designs as the contracted firm responsible for supplying inspectorate uniforms. According to Ndeti, anyone claiming to act on behalf of the company must present proper legal backing, including a valid power of attorney or formal appointment.

The dispute comes amid rising tension following an incident in Machakos Town on March 31. Kioko was reportedly injured during a protest by contractors demanding payment. He was later hospitalised after receiving treatment at multiple facilities. While addressing the incident, Ndeti struck a cautious tone, saying, “We do not condone violence in any form,” and urging calm as the issue is handled through legal channels.

At the centre of the conflict is a contract tied to the 2023/2024 financial year. The governor acknowledged that deliveries were made but described them as partial and unverified within the required timelines. This, she explained, led to the claim being classified as a pending bill under public finance rules.

Beyond the individual case, the governor used the moment to highlight a wider financial clean-up. Her administration reviewed billions in inherited claims, separating valid debts from those lacking proper documentation. A portion has already been paid, with the remaining balance scheduled for settlement through future budgets.

Ndeti emphasised that due process must be followed. “Public demonstrations and media campaigns… cannot override lawful procedures,” she said. As pressure mounts, the standoff now raises broader questions about transparency, accountability, and how far suppliers can go in demanding what they believe they are owed.